Impacts of Eco-Poverty Alleviation Policies on Farmer Livelihood Changes and Response Mechanisms in a Karst Area of China from a Sustainable Perspective

Yan Liu (), Zhu Qian, Han Kong, Ran Wu, Pengfei Zheng and Wenyi Qin
Additional contact information
Yan Liu: School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
Zhu Qian: School of Planning, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
Han Kong: School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
Ran Wu: School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
Pengfei Zheng: School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
Wenyi Qin: School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 3, 1-17

Abstract: Eco-poverty alleviation policies have significant impacts on the changes in farmer household livelihoods. This study developed a multi-dimensional index system, which applies the social cognitive theory and farmer household livelihood capital to analyze the effects of eco-poverty alleviation policies on farmer household livelihood change in a karst area in China. The multivariate logistic, entropy weight, and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution models were used to analyze the responses of 892 farmer households from eight villages in Guizhou Province, China. The results show that the Poverty Alleviation Resettlement Project (PARP) had the highest impact as it enables higher engagement of farmer households in non-agricultural activities, resulting in significant livelihood changes. Among the eco-poverty alleviation policies studied, changes in livelihoods of farmer households are highest from PARP, followed by the Ecological Forest Ranger Project (EFRP), Grain for Green Program (GGP), Forest Ecosystem Compensation Program (FECP), and Single Carbon Sink Program (SCSP). Specifically, GGP received the highest response from farmer households working out-of-province, whereas SCSP received the lowest. EFRP received the highest response from farmer households working in the village. Farmer households in different regions were found to respond differently to various eco-poverty alleviation policies, based on how specific policies can address their practical problems. It is also related to the delayed effects of these policies on their livelihoods. This study provides a theoretical basis for optimizing livelihood improvements for farmers at the regional level, which can aid in formulating strategies in the future to alleviate poverty and revitalize local rural communities.

Keywords: eco-poverty alleviation policy; farmer household; livelihood pattern; deep poverty-stricken villages; karst area (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2618/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2618/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2618-:d:1054268

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().