Development and Design Perspective of a Model for Analyzing the Social Life Cycle of Public Organizations: Examination of Existing Models

Bernadette Sidonie Libom, Marzia Traverso, Rose Nangah Mankaa and Alessandro Manzardo ()
Additional contact information
Bernadette Sidonie Libom: Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, DICEA, 35131 Padova, Italy
Marzia Traverso: Institute of Sustainability in Civil Engineering in RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Rose Nangah Mankaa: Institute of Sustainability in Civil Engineering in RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Alessandro Manzardo: Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, DICEA, 35131 Padova, Italy

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 16, 1-19

Abstract: This paper establishes a comprehensive framework for evaluating the social life cycle of public services through a thorough examination of existing literature published from 2013 to 2022. The central research question is to determine how insights from this literature review can contribute to the advancement of social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) methodologies within the public sector. Methods: To address this question, we conducted a mixed-methods analysis of data sourced from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The quantitative analysis determined the total number of S-LCA and SO-LCA papers published by main journals, and main authors. The qualitative analysis highlighted the different themes and research objectives addressed in the work relating to the S-LCA of products/services and organizations. Our findings indicate that a total of 222 papers on S-LCA were published across 94 journals. However, there is a noticeable gap in research specifically targeting public services, with most studies concentrating on products, services, and organizations. Despite the absence of direct scientific data, our study identified 17 actors, 74 impact subcategories, and 178 indicators that are potentially relevant to the S-LCA of public services. Given the unique characteristics of public services, it is imperative to develop tailored stakeholder categories, subcategories, and performance indicators for each service type. This approach will facilitate more accurate assessments of the social impacts of public services, thereby aiding both the scientific community and S-LCA practitioners in their evaluations.

Keywords: life cycle thinking; social life cycle assessment; public organizations; public services; inventory of existing models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6925/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6925/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6925-:d:1455103

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().