Do Firms Follow through on Environmental Commitments? An Empirical Examination

Rick Hardcopf (), Kevin Linderman and Rachna Shah
Additional contact information
Rick Hardcopf: Huntsman School of Business, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
Kevin Linderman: Smeal College of Business, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Rachna Shah: Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 17, 1-29

Abstract: In response to ever-increasing pressure from stakeholders to reduce the impact of their operations and supply chain on the natural environment, firms frequently make public commitments to improve environmental performance. However, the commitments are difficult to validate and thus of unknown quality. Understanding whether and when the commitments are valid proxies for action is essential because they are used by environmentally conscious stakeholders to assess firm environmental performance in anticipation of buying from, investing in, working for, or selling to a firm. Results from examining 442 U.S. manufacturing firms show that firms generally follow through on such commitments. Larger firms and firms with better environmental performance are more likely to follow through. However, firms tend not to follow through if they are experiencing negative environmental publicity or resource constraints at the time of the commitment. The results provide important insights for environmentally conscious stakeholders who use the commitments to determine whether to buy from, invest in, work for, or supply to a firm. The study also highlights the benefits to firm leaders of following through and provides input towards ideas that can increase follow-through. Finally, the study contributes to several streams of the research literature, including the literature evaluating environmental management, environment commitments, and environmental accidents.

Keywords: public commitment; environmental commitment; environmental management; sustainability; environmental accident (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7444/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7444/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7444-:d:1466119

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().