Innovative Cross-Sectional Configurations for Low-Cost Bamboo Composite (LCBC) Structural Columns

Cameron Padfield, Ben Drury, Ghazaleh Soltanieh, Mona Rajabifard and Amir Mofidi ()
Additional contact information
Cameron Padfield: School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
Ben Drury: School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
Ghazaleh Soltanieh: Department of Engineering, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
Mona Rajabifard: Department of Engineering, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
Amir Mofidi: Department of Engineering, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 17, 1-23

Abstract: This paper investigates the effect of innovative cross-sectional configurations on Low-Cost Bamboo Composite (LCBC) structural members. The study employs both experimental and numerical methods with different resin matrices and bamboo species. In this study, LCBC short columns are designed with different innovative cross-sectional configurations in an attempt to overcome the costly production processes of engineered bamboo. This approach uses bundles of bamboo, both in culm and strip forms. A compatible, environmentally responsible, and economically justifiable resin matrix is used to fabricate an LCBC member. The production of LCBC members does not necessitate highly advanced technology. This capability enables the production of LCBC members in custom-designed cross-sectional shapes and lengths. This study introduces the Russian doll (RD), Big Russian doll (BRD), Hawser (HAW), and Scrimber (SCR) cross-sectional configurations. Extra-large, large, medium, and small sizes of bamboo are employed. Synthetic Epoxy (EXP), a Bio-based Experimental soft filler (BE1), Bio-Epoxy (BE2), Furan-based (PF1) matrices are applied. Furthermore, Moso, Guadua, Madake, and Tali bamboo species are incorporated. The results of this study reveal that the most efficient cross-sectional configuration for compressive strength is the HAW configuration, closely followed by the SCR configuration. LCBC members with bio-resins have shown excellent promise in competing in strength with those made with their synthetic counterparts. The maximum compressive strengths (MPa) were achieved by two specimens with synthetic epoxy closely followed by a specimen with bio-epoxy, namely HAW-EPX-M, RD-EPX-M, and RD-BE2-G specimens with 78 MPa, 75 MPa, and 72 MPa, respectively. In terms of the modulus of elasticity of LCBC with different resin matrices, the stiffest specimens were HAW-BE2-M1, HAW-EPX-M, and HAW-BE2-M2 with 3.89 GPa, 3.08 GPa, and 2.54 GPa, respectively. The theoretical and numerical modelling of the LCBC members showed excellent correlation with the experimental results, which provides the capacity to design LCBC for engineering projects. The LCBC design can be further developed with more bamboo and less resin content.

Keywords: green construction materials; sustainable construction; bio-based construction materials; low-cost bamboo composites (LCBC); bio-resins; bamboo composites; numerical modelling; bio-epoxy; furan resin (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7451/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7451/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7451-:d:1466228

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().