Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Study on Carbon Footprint of Water Treatment Plants: Case Study of Indonesia and Taiwan

Ali Ouattara, Resita Nadya Noor Azhaari, Allen H. Hu (), Chien-Hung Kuo and Hongwei (Lance) Huang
Additional contact information
Ali Ouattara: Institute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan
Resita Nadya Noor Azhaari: PT. Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk, Jakarta 12950, Indonesia
Allen H. Hu: Institute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan
Chien-Hung Kuo: Institute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan
Hongwei (Lance) Huang: Institute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 19, 1-17

Abstract: Access to clean and safe water is essential to sustain human life. With the growth of the world population, the demand for clean water is also increasing. Water Treatment Plants (WTPs) are among the highest electricity consumers, thus causing damage to the environment and human health by producing solid waste and sludge as by-products, along with air pollution and noise. With the fourth highest population in the world, Indonesia faces a high demand for clean water. The country has pledged to reach net zero by 2060 or sooner, requiring effort in all sectors of the economy. Taiwan is relatively small compared to Indonesia but has a higher average clean water supply per capita than Indonesia. This study assessed and compared the Carbon Footprint (CF) emitted from four WTPs in Indonesia and Taiwan. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used, employing a cradle to gate as the methodology. The results showed that the Indonesian WTPs emit more CF than the Taiwanese ones. Electricity consumption from the intake operation and screening process mainly contributes to the CF in most of the studied WTPs. While chemical usage is related to the amount of treated water and the water quality regulations, their consumption has more impact on ecosystem services in Taiwan. Using both renewable energy and good chemical management will be a better solution to lessen the environmental impact of all of these WTPs.

Keywords: carbon footprint; environmental impacts; life cycle assessment; urban water supply; water treatment plant (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8409/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8409/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8409-:d:1487155

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().