Are New Campus Mobility Trends Causing Health Concerns?
Zeenat Kotval-K (),
Shruti Khandelwal,
Eva Kassens-Noor,
Tongbin Teresa Qu and
Mark Wilson
Additional contact information
Zeenat Kotval-K: School of Planning, Design & Construction, Michigan State University, 552 W. Circle Dr., East Lansing, MI 48840, USA
Shruti Khandelwal: School of Planning, Design & Construction, Michigan State University, 552 W. Circle Dr., East Lansing, MI 48840, USA
Eva Kassens-Noor: School of Planning, Design & Construction, Michigan State University, 552 W. Circle Dr., East Lansing, MI 48840, USA
Tongbin Teresa Qu: School of Planning, Design & Construction, Michigan State University, 552 W. Circle Dr., East Lansing, MI 48840, USA
Mark Wilson: School of Planning, Design & Construction, Michigan State University, 552 W. Circle Dr., East Lansing, MI 48840, USA
Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 6, 1-13
Abstract:
An influx of new mobility trends such as fare-free bus transportation, ride hail, and e-scooter services to improve access and affordability of transportation on campus may be shifting the travel behavior of campus patrons such that it affects their long-term health outcomes. The main research questions explored in this study are as follows: (1) why university patrons choose new modes of travel?; (2) what existing mode did the new modes of travel replace for the riders?; and (3) is the average body mass index (BMI) of users primarily using non-motorized transit options lower than those using motorized or both (referred to as hybrid) for on-campus travel needs? An online survey was administered to a campus community (n = 3309) including students (48%), faculty (15%), and staff (37%) in fall of 2018 when fare-free bus transportation and e-scooters became available on campus, and a gradual increase in ridership of ride-hail services was simultaneously observed. This study found that campus patrons were more inclined to replace active modes of travel with affordable and accessible modes of transportation, thereby substituting their walking or biking routine with app-based transportation services. The mean BMI among travelers who chose motorized transportation modes was more than active travelers, and the BMI was statistically significantly associated with age, gender, race, class standing (undergraduate/graduate), and residence on/off campus. This study concludes with suggestions to prevent substitution of active with non-active transport choices and provides policy guidelines to increase awareness on achieving physical activity levels through active modes of travel for university patrons.
Keywords: non-motorized transport; motorized transport; BMI; campus mobility; physical activity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2249/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2249/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2249-:d:1353204
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().