Sustainability Orientation Paradox: Do Banks Ensure Strategic Sustainable Development?

Edgars Sedovs (), Iveta Ludviga and Tatjana Volkova
Additional contact information
Edgars Sedovs: Department of Management, BA School of Business and Finance, Krisjana Valdemara 161, LV-1013 Riga, Latvia
Iveta Ludviga: Business Department, RISEBA University of Applied Sciences, Meza 3, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
Tatjana Volkova: Department of Management, BA School of Business and Finance, Krisjana Valdemara 161, LV-1013 Riga, Latvia

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 13, 1-32

Abstract: In this study, we examine banks’ sustainability orientations (SOs) in the Baltic region, focusing on how institutional, stakeholder, national culture, and leadership factors influence strategic alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We assess how Baltic banks integrate sustainable development using a bibliometric review, financial performance analysis, Spearman’s rank correlation, and content analysis of sustainability-related disclosures for 2023, and interpret Hofstede’s cultural dimensions of the Baltic countries alongside these results. Our bibliometric review reveals limited research on SO and SD in banking, with a gradual annual increase of 14.8%. Our content analysis findings suggest that smaller banks are more broadly aligned with the SDGs; however, 36.4% of the largest banks in the region did not have a dedicated sustainability report a year before ESRS and CSRD requirements became mandatory. Notably, the reporting approach shows no statistically significant correlation with assets, size, global/local coverage, or the number of aligned SDGs. Furthermore, our content analysis findings reveal a persistent sustainability paradox: while economic and environmental goals are strategically prioritised, social SDGs are significantly underrepresented. We propose that this reflects a lack of demand for socially sustainable development rooted in regional contexts and national culture, which shape SO and organisational and leadership responses.

Keywords: sustainability orientation; banking; sustainability paradox; stakeholder expectations; institutional pressures; leadership; national culture; sustainable development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6122/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6122/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6122-:d:1694360

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().