The Application of Landscape Indicators for Landscape Quality Assessment; Case of Zahleh, Lebanon

Roula Aad, Nour Zaher, Victoria Dawalibi (), Rodrigue el Balaa, Jane Loukieh and Nabil Nemer ()
Additional contact information
Roula Aad: Department of Landscape and Territory Planning, Faculty of Agronomy, Lebanese University, Dekwaneh P.O. Box 90775, Lebanon
Nour Zaher: Department of Landscape and Territory Planning, Faculty of Agronomy, Lebanese University, Dekwaneh P.O. Box 90775, Lebanon
Victoria Dawalibi: Department of Landscape and Territory Planning, Faculty of Agronomy, Lebanese University, Dekwaneh P.O. Box 90775, Lebanon
Rodrigue el Balaa: Department of Agriculture, Issam Fares Faculty of Technology, University of Balamand, Tripoli P.O. Box 100, Lebanon
Jane Loukieh: Department of Interior Architecture, Faculty of Fine Arts and Architecture, Lebanese University, Deir el Qamar P.O. Box 6573/14, Lebanon
Nabil Nemer: Climate Resilience in Agriculture and Biodiversity (CRAB), Higher Center for Research, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh P.O. Box 446, Lebanon

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 19, 1-19

Abstract: Landscapes are vital systems where ecological, cultural, perceptual, and socio-economic values meet, making their quality assessment essential for sustainable development. Landscape Quality (LQ), shaped by the interaction of natural processes and human activities, remains methodologically challenging due to its interdisciplinarity and the need to integrate multiple dimensions. This challenge is particularly perceived in peri-urban areas, predominantly understudied in landscape research. This article addresses this gap in LQ assessment at peri-urban landscapes, through the case of Houch Al Oumaraa, Zahleh, a peri-urban area of patrimonial significance and agricultural landscape value. To evaluate the four spatial dimensions of LQ (structural, ecological, cultural and visual), we adopted a mixed methodology, where a pre-developed set of landscape indicators (LIs) applied within GIS and spatial technics, were supplemented by expert analysis through visual studies. Two questions framed this research: (i) is remote sensing sufficient to assess peri-urban LQ, and (ii) what are the limits of applying pre-developed LIs to diverse landscape contexts? Results show moderate fragmentation (CONTAG 61.6%), low diversity (MSDI 0.27), high density of cultural monuments (PROTAP 4.19) and average visual disharmony (FCDHI 0.49). Findings reveal that spatial dimensions alone are insufficient for assessing LQ of peri-urban landscapes, where socio-economic dimensions must also be integrated. Structural indicators (PLAND, MPA, ED, CONTAG) and MSDI proved transferable, while ECOLBAR was less applicable, cultural indicators (PROTAP, HLE) were limited to tangible heritage, and visual indicators (FCDHI, SDHI) highly context dependent. Establishing a differentiated yet standardized framework would not only enhance methodological precision but also ensure that LQ assessment remain relevant across diverse contexts, providing policymakers with actionable insights to align planning with sustainability goals.

Keywords: landscape quality assessment; landscape indicators; peri-urban sustainability; landscape sustainability; GIS spatial analysis; interdisciplinary framework (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8946/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8946/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8946-:d:1767204

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().