Multi-Scenario Simulation and Restoration Strategy of Ecological Security Pattern in the Yellow River Delta

Danning Chen, Weifeng Chen (), Xincun Zhu (), Shugang Xie, Peiyu Du, Xiaolong Chen and Dong Lv
Additional contact information
Danning Chen: College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
Weifeng Chen: College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
Xincun Zhu: College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
Shugang Xie: College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
Peiyu Du: College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
Xiaolong Chen: College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
Dong Lv: College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 20, 1-28

Abstract: The Yellow River Delta is one of China’s most ecologically fragile regions, experiencing prolonged pressures from rapid urbanization and ecological degradation. Existing research, however, has predominantly focused on constructing ecological security patterns under single scenarios, with limited systematic multi-scenario comparisons and insufficient statistical support. To address this gap, this study proposes an integrated framework of “land use simulation—multi-scenario ecological security pattern construction—statistical comparative analysis.” Using the PLUS model, three scenarios were constructed—Business-as-Usual (BAU), Priority Urban Development (PUD), and Priority Ecological Protection (PEP)—to simulate land use changes by 2040. Habitat quality assessment, Multi-Scale Pattern Analysis (MSPA), landscape connectivity, and circuit theory were integrated to identify ecological source areas, corridors, and nodes, incorporating a novel hexagonal grid partitioning method. Statistical significance was evaluated using parametric tests (ANOVA, t -test) and non-parametric tests (permutation test, PERMANOVA). Analysis indicated significant differences in ecological security patterns across scenarios. Under the PEP scenario, ecological source areas reached 3580.42 km 2 (12.39% of the total Yellow River Delta), corresponding to a 14.85% increase relative to the BAU scenario and a 32.79% increase relative to the PUD scenario. These gains are primarily attributable to stringent wetland and forestland protection policies, which successfully limited the encroachment of construction land into ecological space. Habitat quality and connectivity markedly improved, resulting in the highest ecosystem stability. By contrast, the PUD scenario experienced an 851.46 km 2 expansion of construction land, resulting in the shrinkage of ecological source areas and intensified fragmentation, consequently increasing ecological security risks. The BAU scenario demonstrated moderate outcomes, with a moderately balanced spatial configuration. In conclusion, this study introduces an ecological restoration strategy of “five zones, one belt, one center, and multiple corridors” based on multi-scenario ecological security patterns. This provides a scientific foundation for ecological restoration and territorial spatial planning in the Yellow River Delta, while the proposed multi-scenario statistical comparison method provides a replicable methodological framework for ecological security pattern research in other delta regions.

Keywords: PLUS model; ecological security pattern; ecological restoration; land use change; circuit theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9061/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9061/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9061-:d:1770085

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().