Carbon Footprint Accounting and Analysis of Chinese Furniture Enterprises’ Panel Cabinets

Yi Liu, Yiboran Wang, Chengling Wang, Tianchen Zhou, Jing Hu () and Zhihui Wu ()
Additional contact information
Yi Liu: College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210037, China
Yiboran Wang: College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210037, China
Chengling Wang: College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210037, China
Tianchen Zhou: College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210037, China
Jing Hu: School of Fine Arts and Design, Chuzhou University, 2 Langya West Road, Chuzhou 239099, China
Zhihui Wu: College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210037, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 20, 1-13

Abstract: Amid global efforts to reach carbon neutrality, quantifying the cradle-to-gate carbon footprint of panel kitchen cabinets is vital for the transformation of China’s furniture industry to low carbon emissions. This study aims to quantify and compare the cradle-to-gate carbon footprints of three L-shaped panel cabinets made of different materials and to identify the most effective carbon reduction strategies for the Chinese furniture industry. The emission factor method proposed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was utilized. The results revealed significant differences in the carbon footprints among the three cabinet products. Specifically, Product A, featuring a DuPont stone countertop from the United States and domestically produced double-sided decorative door panels, exhibited the highest carbon footprint which was 998.5 kgCO 2 eq. Product B, with an Italian natural marble countertop and single-sided acrylic door panels, had the lowest carbon footprint which was 610.7 kgCO 2 eq. The carbon footprints indicated that key stages such as cabinet bodies, countertops, hardware, and cabinet doors were substantial contributors. Raw material production and processing emerged as the primary sources of carbon emissions, with countertop transportation also contributing significantly. Based on the results, this paper proposed several carbon reduction suggestions. These include optimizing material selection, enhancing energy efficiency in raw material production and processing, optimizing transportation methods, emphasizing the carbon reduction potential of hardware components, and strengthening carbon footprint monitoring and management.

Keywords: carbon footprint; panel cabinet; furniture; comparative analysis; carbon reduction suggestions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9267/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9267/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9267-:d:1774603

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().