Investigating Ammonia as an Alternative Marine Fuel: A SWOT Analysis Using the Best–Worst Method

Canberk Hazar () and Alper Seyhan
Additional contact information
Canberk Hazar: Department of Marine Engineering, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, 67300 Zonguldak, Turkey
Alper Seyhan: Department of Maritime Transportation and Management Engineering, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, 67300 Zonguldak, Turkey

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 20, 1-23

Abstract: The shipping industry remains heavily dependent on heavy fuel oils, which account for approximately 77% of fuel consumption and contribute significantly to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In line with the IMO’s decarbonization targets, ammonia has emerged as a promising carbon-free alternative. This study evaluates the strategic viability of ammonia, especially green production, as a marine fuel through a hybrid SWOT–Best–Worst Method (BWM) analysis, combining literature insights with expert judgment. Data were collected from 17 maritime professionals with an average of 15.7 years of experience, ensuring robust sectoral representation and methodological consistency. The results highlight that opportunities hold the greatest weight (0.352), particularly the criteria “mandatory carbon-free by 2050” (O3:0.106) and “ammonia–hydrogen climate solution” (O2:0.080). Weaknesses rank second (0.270), with “higher toxicity than other marine fuels” (W5:0.077) as the most critical concern. Strengths (0.242) underscore ammonia’s advantage as a “carbon-free and sulfur-free fuel” (S1:0.078), while threats (0.137) remain less influential, though “costly green ammonia” (T3:0.035) and “uncertainty of green ammonia” (T1:0.034) present notable risks. Overall, the analysis suggests that regulatory imperatives and environmental benefits outweigh safety, technical, and economic challenges. Ammonia demonstrates strong potential to serve as viable marine fuel in achieving the maritime sector’s long-term decarbonization goals.

Keywords: ammonia; greenhouse gas emissions; alternative marine fuel; SWOT analysis; BWM (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9314/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9314/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9314-:d:1775614

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().