 Novel Technological and Management Options for Accelerating Transformational Changes in Rice and Livestock SystemsNgonidzashe Chirinda,
Laura Arenas,
Sandra Loaiza,
Catalina Trujillo,
Maria Katto,
Paula Chaparro,
Jonathan Nuñez,
Jacobo Arango,
Deissy Martinez-Baron,
Ana María Loboguerrero,
Luis A. Becerra Lopez-Lavalle,
Ivan Avila,
Myriam Guzmán,
Michael Peters,
Jennifer Twyman,
María García,
Laura Serna,
Daniel Escobar,
Diksha Arora,
Jeimar Tapasco,
Lady Mazabel,
Fernando Correa,
Manabu Ishitani,
Mayesse Da Silva,
Eduardo Graterol,
Santiago Jaramillo,
Adriana Pinto,
Andres Zuluaga,
Nelson Lozano,
Ryan Byrnes,
Gabriel LaHue,
Carolina Alvarez,
Idupulapati Rao and
Rolando Barahona
Sustainability, 2017, vol. 9, issue 11, 1-16 Abstract: Agricultural producers grapple with low farm yields and declining ecosystem services within their landscapes. In several instances, agricultural production systems may be considered largely unsustainable in socioeconomic and ecological (resource conservation and use and impact on nature) terms. Novel technological and management options that can serve as vehicles to promote the provision of multiple benefits, including the improvement of smallholder livelihoods, are needed. We call for a paradigm shift to allow designing and implementing agricultural systems that are not only efficient (serving as a means to promote development based on the concept of creating more goods and services while using fewer resources and creating less waste) but can also be considered synergistic (symbiotic relationship between socio-ecological systems) by simultaneously contributing to major objectives of economic, ecological, and social (equity) improvement of agro-ecosystems. These transformations require strategic approaches that are supported by participatory system-level research, experimentation, and innovation. Using data from several studies, we here provide evidence for technological and management options that could be optimized, promoted, and adopted to enable agricultural systems to be efficient, effective, and, indeed, sustainable. Specifically, we present results from a study conducted in Colombia, which demonstrated that, in rice systems, improved water management practices such as Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD) reduce methane emissions (~70%). We also show how women can play a key role in AWD adoption. For livestock systems, we present in vitro evidence showing that the use of alternative feed options such as cassava leaves contributes to livestock feed supplementation and could represent a cost-effective approach for reducing enteric methane emissions (22% to 55%). We argue that to design and benefit from sustainable agricultural systems, there is a need for better targeting of interventions that are co-designed, co-evaluated, and co-promoted, with farmers as allies of transformational change (as done in the climate-smart villages), not as recipients of external knowledge. Moreover, for inclusive sustainability that harnesses existing knowledge and influences decision-making processes across scales, there is a need for constant, efficient, effective, and real trans-disciplinary communication and collaboration. Keywords: rice; livestock; cassava leaves; forage; greenhouse gases (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:1891-:d:116629 Access Statistics for this article Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu More articles in Sustainability from MDPI |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.