Business case evaluation of cooperative, connected and automated mobility service provision in cross-border settings

Asma Chiha, Thibault Degrande, Sofie Verbrugge, Didier Colle, George Avdikos, Walter Aigner, Benoit Denis and David Garcia-Roger
Additional contact information
Asma Chiha: IMEC - IMEC - KU Leuven - Catholic University of Leuven = Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, UGENT - Universiteit Gent = Ghent University = Université de Gand
Thibault Degrande: IMEC - IMEC - KU Leuven - Catholic University of Leuven = Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, UGENT - Universiteit Gent = Ghent University = Université de Gand
Sofie Verbrugge: IMEC - IMEC - KU Leuven - Catholic University of Leuven = Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, UGENT - Universiteit Gent = Ghent University = Université de Gand
Didier Colle: IMEC - IMEC - KU Leuven - Catholic University of Leuven = Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, UGENT - Universiteit Gent = Ghent University = Université de Gand
George Avdikos: Eight Bells Ltd
Walter Aigner: HiTec Vienna
Benoit Denis: CEA-LETI - Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives - Laboratoire d'Electronique et de Technologie de l'Information - DRT (CEA) - Direction de Recherche Technologique (CEA) - CEA - Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives
David Garcia-Roger: UPV - Universitat Politècnica de València = Universitad Politecnica de Valencia = Polytechnic University of Valencia

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In this paper, we present a techno-economic analysis of providing a Cooperative, Connected and Automated Mobility (CCAM) use case, namely Cooperative Lane Merging (CLM), in a cross-border environment. Multiple network deployment scenarios are proposed to provide Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) connectivity with respect to PC5 Mode 4 – enabled RSUs. Total cost of Ownership (TCO) model together with four revenue models are developed to assess the viability of providing CCAM services in the studied settings. Results show that the higher the number of simultaneous connected cars, the higher the TCO of the required deployment needs to be to meet the defined KPIs and especially for the green field deployment with no existing fibre cable or electricity facilities. Another important insight from this analysis is that only with a high fleet penetration rate of connected vehicles, a viable business case can be achieved.

Keywords: Cooperative Connected and Automated Mobility (CCAM); Cooperative Lane Merging (CLM); Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I); Road Side Unit (RSU); Total Cost of Ownership (TCO); Techno-economic analysis; 5G Networks; Cellular-Vehicle to everything (C-V2X); Cross-Border; Revenue models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-10-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-inv and nep-ure
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://cea.hal.science/cea-04571250v1
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in FNWF 2022 - 2022 IEEE Future Networks World Forum, Oct 2022, Montreal, Canada. pp.209-214, ⟨10.1109/FNWF55208.2022.00044⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://cea.hal.science/cea-04571250v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:cea-04571250

DOI: 10.1109/FNWF55208.2022.00044

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().