PLM opportunities and weaknesses to support collaborative engineering

Valery Merminod () and Eric Blanco ()
Additional contact information
Valery Merminod: CERAM - CERAM Business Cchool
Eric Blanco: G-SCOP_CC - Conception collaborative - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - UJF - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - INPG - Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to discuss the opportunities and the weaknesses of Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) technology to support collaborative design process. Whereas Product Lifecycle Management tools are deployed in many firms, only few studies highlight their impact on design processes. Engineering literature focus on the technology itself (and not on processes) and management literature does not deeply investigate this matter. The study is based on a 3 years analysis of a PLM system project in a large French company, int the sector of small domestic appliances. The research design is based on a single case study which corresponds to a business unit dedicated to Linen Care product family. In the first part, we highlight how PLM offers functionalities that facilitate the stakeholder coordination during the design process (Stark 2004). This IT tool offers a structured framework for collaborative Engineering and fosters the definition and standardisation of workflows and intermediary objects that are produced and used during the design process. In the second part of the paper, we discuss the weaknesses of that technology to support the day to day collaboration and the creation of new objects. We show that PLM enables to share elaborated design information whenever it fails to support data elaboration process. Social aspects of collaboration like confidence, engagement are not taken into account in the PLM systems. Finally, we highlight that the implicit model of coordination in PLM exclude cooperation. This case study allows us to discuss the necessity fort different collaborative workspaces which refer to different design collaboration needs.

Keywords: PLM; design; collaborative design; information management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-06-30
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00278071v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in International Product Development Management Conference, Jun 2008, Hamburg, Germany

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00278071v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00278071

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().