Argumentation to compose services

Maxime Morge (), Jean-Christophe Routier () and Yann Secq ()
Additional contact information
Maxime Morge: LIFL - Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale de Lille - Université de Lille, Sciences et Technologies - Inria - Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique - Université de Lille, Sciences Humaines et Sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, SMAC - Systèmes Multi-Agents et Comportements - CRIStAL - Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille - UMR 9189 - Centrale Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa] - UniPi - University of Pisa [Italy] = Università di Pisa [Italia] = Université de Pise [Italie], DI - Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa] - UniPi - University of Pisa [Italy] = Università di Pisa [Italia] = Université de Pise [Italie]
Jean-Christophe Routier: LIFL - Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale de Lille - Université de Lille, Sciences et Technologies - Inria - Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique - Université de Lille, Sciences Humaines et Sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, SMAC - Systèmes Multi-Agents et Comportements - CRIStAL - Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille - UMR 9189 - Centrale Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Yann Secq: LIFL - Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale de Lille - Université de Lille, Sciences et Technologies - Inria - Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique - Université de Lille, Sciences Humaines et Sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, SMAC - Systèmes Multi-Agents et Comportements - CRIStAL - Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille - UMR 9189 - Centrale Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: We propose in this paper a framework for inter-agents dialogue on actions, which formalize a deliberative process. This framework bounds a dialectical system in which argumentative agents arbitrate and play to reach a practical agreement. For this purpose, we propose an argumentation-based reasoning to manage the conflicts between plans having different strengths for different agents. Moreover, we propose a model of agents which justify the plans to which they commit and take into account the plans of their interlocutors. In the scope of our dialectical system, an agent is responsible of the final decision outcome which is taken according to the autority of the players, the uttered plans and her own rules and priorities. We illustrate this paper with a services composition.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Proceedings of the 18th Belgian-Dutch conference of Artificial Intelligence (BNAI'2006), 2006, undef, France. pp.237--246

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00731949

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().