The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together
Margaret Peteraf,
Giada Di Stefano and
Gianmario Verona
Additional contact information
Margaret Peteraf: Tuck School of Business - Dartmouth College [Hanover]
Giada Di Stefano: GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Gianmario Verona: Bocconi University - Bocconi University [Milan, Italy]
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
A critical issue has been absent from the conversation on dynamic capabilities: the two seminal papers represent not only different but contradictory understandings of the construct's core elements. Here, we explore the reasons for this, using author cocitation analysis to inform our analysis. Our findings suggest that the field is being socially constructed on the basis of two separate domains of knowledge and that underlying structural impediments have impeded dialog across the domains. In light of this evidence, then, we take up the challenge to find a solution to this dilemma. By employing a contingency-based approach, we show that there are ways to unify the field that rely, paradoxically, on integrating the two contradictory views, while still preserving the assumptions that led to their differences.
Keywords: dynamic capabilities; cocitation analysis; development path; resource-based; dynamic bundles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (97)
Published in Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34 (12), pp.1389-1410. ⟨10.1002/smj.2078⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00982438
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2078
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().