 Quelques points de repères pour évaluer l’analyse des conflits dans les théories économiques, avec une emphase particulière sur la question spatialePost-Print from HAL Abstract: Except a few exceptions, the economic theory did not seize the question of the conflictness. A hypothesis can be formulated as for the motives for this omission which characterizes structurally the economic analysis: unlike other central concepts as competition, resources allocation, equilibrium, rationality, or utility, the content of the notion of conflict is a priori difficult to encircle and to problematize, notably towards nearby notions as the dissension or the differences of interests. But, especially, the idea of conflict has, at least a priori, a social connotation: the conflict is a social phenomenon the consideration of which supposes a sociological point of view. The article studies at first the reasons of a missing dialogue between economic theory and the question of the conflicts. In the second part of the paper, we investigate the analysis of conflict behaviours within spatial economic theories. The conclusion puts in light some research perspectives. Keywords: ECONOMIE; CONFLIT; CHOIX SOCIAL; DROIT DE PROPRIETE; EXTERNALITE; ECONOMIC; CONFLICT; SOCIAL CHOICE; PROPERTY RIGHT; EXTERNALITIE (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in Géographie, Économie, Société, 2007, 9 (2), pp.215-240. ⟨10.3166/ges.9.215-240⟩ There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01197775 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Post-Print from HAL |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.