Résilience et fabrique territoriale des risques. Perspectives croisées à partir de trois programmes de recherche

Julien Rebotier (), Frédéric Grelot (), Mathilde Gralepois () and Stéphanie Defossez ()
Additional contact information
Julien Rebotier: LISST - Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Solidarités, Sociétés, Territoires - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT - Université de Toulouse - ENSFEA - École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INP - PURPAN - Ecole d'Ingénieurs de Purpan - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - UT - Université de Toulouse
Frédéric Grelot: UMR G-EAU - Gestion de l'Eau, Acteurs, Usages - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - AgroParisTech - IRSTEA - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier
Mathilde Gralepois: CITERES - Cités, Territoires, Environnement et Sociétés - UT - Université de Tours - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Stéphanie Defossez: GRED - Gouvernance, Risque, Environnement, Développement - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - IRD [Occitanie] - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: As environmental and climate issues face the question of risks, new paradigms flourish in the field of flood management: preparation, vulnerability, sustainable development, adaptation and today resilience. The ongoing urbanisation and development of places at risk create huge controversies. The concept of resilience does not seem to solve conflicts between land uses and rules, between prevention and development, between national and local regulation. If the concept is a success in the academic field, resilience does not provide the expected answers, and it even seems to raise new ambiguities. The paper shows the problems and opportunities of the implementation of the concept of resilience at local level. It aims to take it as a mean to analyse the evolution of developing spaces in France nowadays. Based on the first results from three research projects, we will present several French case studies showing what they teach us about the transformation of temporality, action, democracy and justice.

Keywords: Natural and industrial risks; Spatial planning; Resilience; résilience; risques naturels et technologiques; développement territorial (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-03-17
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01353629v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in CIST2016 - En quête de territoire(s) ?, Collège international des sciences du territoire (CIST), Mar 2016, Grenoble, France. pp.404-408

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01353629v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01353629

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().