The network structure of ideas and the evolutionary synthesis of breakthrough product concepts

Thomas Gillier (), Akin Kazakçi (), Victor Seidel and Gerald Piat ()
Additional contact information
Thomas Gillier: MTS - Management Technologique et Strategique - EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management
Akin Kazakçi: Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Victor Seidel: Babson College
Gerald Piat: EDF R&D - EDF R&D - EDF - EDF

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Innovation teams are tasked to generate new product concepts that are then evaluated for their originality and feasibility for future development. A focus on generating highly original product concepts would imply using ideas novel to the domain of interest, drawing from evolutionary models of innovation through searching and selecting from highly diverse ideas. A focus on feasible product concepts would imply using ideas more well- known to the domain of interest, with a focus on creative synthesis of ideas. Given these conflicting approaches, how should teams recombine ideas to develop "breakthrough concepts" that combine originality and feasibility? Our study tasked ten teams with the generation of such breakthrough concepts, and we developed concept networks describing how each idea introduced within a team was related to one other. These networks allowed us to examine the properties of individual ideas and resulting linkages between them. Through an inductive comparative analysis approach, we were able to determine three practices-selective integration, avoiding fixation, and linking novelty-that together were indicative of breakthrough concepts judged both novel and feasible. Mixed use of these practices resulted in ideas that lacked either novelty or feasibility or both. By focusing on ideas themselves and their network of interrelation, we are able to provide a new lens on how ideation can occur most effectively within organizations and that fits within a model of evolutionary synthesis.

Keywords: ideation; idea network; design; linkography (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-08-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016, ⟨10.5465/AMBPP.2016.179⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01417685

DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2016.179

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().