Patterns of Methylphenidate Use and Assessment of Its Abuse among the ă General Population and Individuals with Drug Dependence
Elisabeth Frauger,
Despina Amaslidou,
Michel Spadari,
Veronique Allaria-Lapierre,
David Braunstein,
Vincent Sciortino,
Xavier Thirion,
Samira Djezzar and
Joëlle Micallef
Additional contact information
Joëlle Micallef: INT - Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe the extent of ă methylphenidate (MPH) abuse and characterize its patterns by following ă several cases involving intravenous administration of crushed MPH ă tablets. Methods: First, a drug reimbursement database (covering 4 ă million inhabitants) was explored to assess the magnitude of MPH abuse ă among the general population, and second, a specific study based on ă individuals with drug dependence was performed to describe abusers' ă characteristics (n = 64), patterns of abuse and clinical implications. ă Results: From 2005 to 2011, the number of patients who were dispensed ă MPH at least once increased by 166%. The patients with `deviant' ă patterns of MPH consumption were mainly male adults with opiate ă maintenance treatment reimbursements. MPH abusers had precarious living ă conditions. Half of them consumed MPH daily by intravenous route and ă reported amphetamine-like effects (cardiovascular events, weight loss, ă psychiatric adverse events). Conclusion: Given the increase of MPH use, ă it is important to warn the scientific community about possible MPH ă abuse, especially in individuals with drug dependence. This study has ă facilitated public health intervention and dissemination of information ă related to MPH abuse among health care professionals at local and ă national levels. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
Keywords: Quality; of; Life (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in European Addiction Research, 2016, 22 (3), pp.119-126. ⟨10.1159/000439273⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482640
DOI: 10.1159/000439273
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().