Analyzing power/meaning relations: A panoptical view of institutional sensemaking

Olivier Baly (), Frédéric Kletz () and Jean-Claude Sardas ()
Additional contact information
Olivier Baly: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Frédéric Kletz: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Jean-Claude Sardas: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Although the literature on institutional work has identified power relations between incumbents and challengers of the institutional status quo as a key determinant in institutional processes, we still know very little about how these power structures actually operate. Drawing on a definition of power as fix and reified meanings, we study how one type of power relation, namely hierarchical structure, has policed the institutional sensemaking of an emergent occupational group who was supposed to carry new regulative templates challenging the prevalence of the Corporate logic in French hospitals. Using an inductive methodology combining survey and focus group data, we observe that the hierarchical power structure typical of the Corporation has shaped the typifications of this group through a disciplinary form of control similar to the one described by Foucault in his analysis of Bentham's Panopticon. Relying on the progressive elaboration of the concept of discipline in Foucault's work, we subsequently highlight how the structural vision of agency that he has proposed could help enrich our understanding of institutional agency and complexity, thereby opening new potential research avenues to address some of the current gaps in the literature on institutional work regarding contextual embeddedness and institutional deviance.

Keywords: Institutional theory; Power relations; Sensemaking; Foucault; Healthcare Organization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-07-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in EGOS Colloquium 2016, Jul 2016, Naples, France

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01503299

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().