In Praise of a Flexible and Sustainable HR Support

Sybille Persson (), Bertrand Agostini () and Aurélie Kleber
Additional contact information
Sybille Persson: ICN Business School, CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine
Bertrand Agostini: ICN Business School, CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine
Aurélie Kleber: CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to highlight the Western roots of the gap between practice and theory in HRM to underline the relevance of a flexible HR support. This support deserves to be nurtured by an insightful consideration of traditional Chinese thought, especially "vital nourishments" and "non-action." Design/methodology/approach Following the methodology of deconstruction provided by French Sinologist and Philosopher François Jullien, this paper brings forward the implicit tenets of Western thought that feed HRD. The work of deconstruction relies here on an "heterotopia" (which literally means "a thought coming from elsewhere") while making use of the founding tenets of traditional Chinese thought. Findings A flexible support, echoing some existing practices of coaching, mentoring and other developmental interactions, acts as an efficient and natural "non-active" development of HR especially relevant when facing stress at work. Research limitations/implications If it is worth recalling the already existing bridges between theory and practice in HRM, it is also important to imagine new ones favorable to HRD. Practical implications The paper provides a critical reference for managers in charge of HRD. Social implications The paper provides a critical reference for academics who wish to be more scholarly engaged in supporting executives and managers. Originality/value The paper challenges the Western ethnocentric reading of management in order to welcome another millenary way of thinking built in China. It escapes the fundamentals of managerial thought which have durably ruled over Western management studies.

Keywords: Paradigms; Coaching; Philosophy; François Jullien; Human resource development; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Management Development, 2017, 36 (3), pp.298-308. ⟨10.1108/JMD-05-2016-0070⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01515124

DOI: 10.1108/JMD-05-2016-0070

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().