Credibility of propensity score matching estimates. An example from Fair Trade certification of coffee producers
Nicolas Lampach and
Ulrich Morawetz
Additional contact information
Nicolas Lampach: BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Ulrich Morawetz: BOKU - Universität für Bodenkultur Wien = University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences [Vienne, Autriche]
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Propensity score matching (PSM) is an increasingly popular method for evaluation studies in agricultural and development economics. However, statisticians and econometricians have stressed that results rely on untestable assumptions, and therefore, guidelines for researchers on how to improve credibility have been developed. We follow one of these guidelines with a data set analysed by other authors to evaluate the impact of Fair Trade certification on the income of coffee producers. We provide thereby a best practice example of how to evaluate the credibility of PSM estimates. We find that a thorough assessment of the assumptions made renders the data we use not suitable for a credible PSM estimation of the effects of treatment. We conclude that the debate about the impact of Fair Trade certification would greatly benefit from a detailed reporting of credibility checking.
Keywords: Credibility; Evaluation; Ethiopia; Coffee certification; Propensity Score Matching (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-03-13
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Published in Applied Economics, 2016, 48 (44), pp.4227 - 4237. ⟨10.1080/00036846.2016.1153795⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01724559
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1153795
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().