From the abstract to the concrete – Implementation of an innovative tool in home care

Anu Kajamaa and Klaus-Peter Schulz ()
Additional contact information
Anu Kajamaa: Helsingin yliopisto = Helsingfors universitet = University of Helsinki
Klaus-Peter Schulz: ICN Business School, CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: From the abstract to the concrete – Implementation of an innovative tool in home care Anu Kajamaa, Klaus-Peter Schulz First Published August 17, 2017 Research Article Download PDFPDF download for From the abstract to the concrete – Implementation of an innovative tool in home care Article information No Access Article Information Article first published online: August 17, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1177/0951484817724581 Anu Kajamaa1, Klaus-Peter Schulz2 1University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 2ICN Business School, Nancy – Metz, France Corresponding Author: Anu Kajamaa, University of Helsinki, Siltavuorenpenger 1 A, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. Email: anu.kajamaa@helsinki.fi Abstract Background The implementation of innovations in practice is a critical factor for change and development processes in health and home care. We therefore analyze how an innovative tool – a mobility agreement to maintain physical mobility of home care clients – was implemented in Finnish home care. Methods Our study involves ethnographic research of 13 home care visits, two years after the mobility agreement was implemented. We analyze the emergence of contradictions, the motives of the actors and the use of artifacts supporting or inhibiting the implementation. Two in-depth cases illustrate the implementation of the mobility agreement in home care visits. Findings Our findings show that, first, to achieve practice change and development, the innovation implementation requires the overcoming of contradictions in the implementation process. Second, it calls for the emergence of a shared motive between the actors to transform the abstract concept of an innovation into a concrete practice. Third, artifacts, customary to the clients are important in supporting the implementation process. Fourth, the implementation brings about a modification of the innovation and the adopting social system. Conclusions Innovation implementation should be seen as a transformation process of an abstract concept into a concrete practice, enabled by the actors involved. Concept design and implementation should be closely linked. In health/home care innovation management, the implementation of innovations needs to be understood as a complex collective learning process. Results can be far reaching – in our case leading to change of home care workers' professional understanding and elderly clients' mobility habits.

Keywords: artifact; contradiction; expansive learning; home care; implementation of innovation; shared motive (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Health Services Management Research, 2017, 31 (1), pp.2-10. ⟨10.1177/0951484817724581⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01768902

DOI: 10.1177/0951484817724581

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().