L'évaluation des enseignants-chercheurs via les seules revues scientifiques classées: des aspects contre-productifs pérennisés

Bernard Guillon ()
Additional contact information
Bernard Guillon: CREG - Centre de recherche et d'études en gestion - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The attempts of measuring regularly the academic scientific activity in France, and more particularly in sciences of management for the last ten years, has showed the importance of Scientific journals' referencing. The slidings, observed in favour of the latter, show that the initial objective-to check the activity of research in the higher education system – has disappeared in front of new stakes. Consequently the direct management of both the lecturers' and university professors' careers has arisen, even in the creation of a caste of public researchers forced to assume a certain amount of additional work. The speech about the credibility of the professors via this type of publications leads eventually to a recurring stress… and weakening of the research.

Keywords: performance; recherche; AERES; CoNRS 37; FNEGE; HCERES (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-12-01
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01865105v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Management & sciences sociales, 2016, RSE et éthique – Impacts sur l’enseignement du management -, 21 (21), pp.78-89

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01865105v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01865105

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().