Conservation contract adoption under fixed and variable costs
Geraldine Ducos and
Pierre Dupraz
Additional contact information
Geraldine Ducos: Économie et Sociologie Rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Farmers' conservation contract adoption is usually explained through the technology lens, i.e. with operational costs depending on the subscribed area and environmental efforts. In their 2003 article, Dupraz et al. analysed this issue by introducing utility farmers directly derive from contract environmental outcomes. They specified farmers' willingness to accept, which is the minimum compensation payment the farmer accepts to enrol and produce environmental services on a given area. Here, we deepen this analysis at two levels. First, at the theoretical one, by introducing fixed compliance costs in the willingness to accept approach. Secondly, we empirically show that among fixed compliance costs, fixed transaction costs are a significant contracting barrier. It explains why smallest farms have a reduced probability to contract.
Keywords: AGRO-ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACT; WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT; FIXED COMPLIANCE COST (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-12-13
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01931625v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published in 1. Journées INRA-SFER de recherches en Sciences Sociales, Société Française d'Economie Rurale (SFER). FRA., Dec 2007, Paris, France. 22 p
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01931625v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01931625
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().