The accuracy of asymmetric GARCH model estimation

Amélie Charles () and Olivier Darné ()
Additional contact information
Amélie Charles: Audencia Business School
Olivier Darné: LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper reviews eight software packages when estimating asymmetric GARCH models (from their default option). We consider the numerical consistency of GJR-GARCH, TGARCH, EGARCH and APARCH estimations with Normal and Student distributions as well as out-of-sample forecasting accuracy, using the model confidence set procedure. We show that results are clearly software-dependent for both asymmetric volatility models, especially for the t-ratios. The out-of-sample forecast results show that the differences in estimating symmetric and asymmetric GARCH models imply slight differences in terms of forecast accuracy, not statistically significant, except in few cases from the QLIKE loss function. Further, the results indicate that the different specifications of the asymmetric GARCH-type models used by the different packages appear to have no significant effect on their forecast accuracy.

Keywords: EGARCH; GJR-GARCH; TARCH; APARCH; Accuracy; Forecasting; Software (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-05
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://audencia.hal.science/hal-01943883
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in International Economics, 2019, 157, pp.179-202. ⟨10.1016/j.inteco.2018.11.001⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://audencia.hal.science/hal-01943883/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01943883

DOI: 10.1016/j.inteco.2018.11.001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().