Superstars

Luc Champarnaud
Additional contact information
Luc Champarnaud: LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The field of cultural economics considers the phenomenon of superstardom an important and stimulating subject. Large sums of money, demand, and the talent of artists seem to be bound by a kind of logic that the economic theory textbooks explain badly. We speak of ‘superstars' when there is evidence of small differences in talent between certain artists whose incomes differ considerably from one each other. Two explanatory arguments have been advanced: the ‘poor substitutability of high quality' argument convincingly succeeds in reconciling this phenomenon with a theory of market that performs well; the ‘winner-takes-all' argument denies the plausibility of such an accordance and considers that superstars are chosen mainly at random. Some glaring examples of the phenomenon are presented here. One of the main methodological problems in assessing the validity of these theoretical arguments is the absence of a reliable measure of talent.

Date: 2020-02-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Trine Bille (dir.); Anna Mignosa (dir.); Ruth Towse (dir.). Teaching Cultural Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.140-147, 2020, ⟨10.4337/9781788970747.00028⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02513116

DOI: 10.4337/9781788970747.00028

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().