History, time and futures studies. Tensions from geostrategy anticipatory practices
Anne Marchais-Roubelat () and
Fabrice Roubelat ()
Additional contact information
Anne Marchais-Roubelat: LIRSA - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en sciences de l'action - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM]
Fabrice Roubelat: CEREGE [Poitiers, La Rochelle] - Centre de recherche en gestion [EA 1722] - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Since seminal futures publications, geostrategy anticipatory practices have infused the futures field, as well as questioned the place of time and history in futures thinking. Exploring the temporal tensions of futures thinking, this paper discusses lessons from two geostrategy futures cases. Bridging history and futures studies, section 1 stresses the wicked nature of future history and discusses research directions to introduce time in futures thinking. Section 2 exhibits the context, the design and the methodological backgrounds of the two cases. Section 3 discusses the temporal tensions between factors, actors and events on the one hand and within action processes on the other hand and suggests developing a streaming approach of anticipation.
Date: 2019-10
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02557600v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published in Anticipation 2019, Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Oct 2019, Oslo, Norway
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-02557600v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02557600
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().