Phosphorus conservation, eutrophication reduction and social welfare improvement: taxation of extracted phosphorus or subsidy of recycled phosphorus ?

Bocar Samba Ba
Additional contact information
Bocar Samba Ba: LAMETA - Laboratoire Montpelliérain d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - Montpellier SupAgro - Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques - UM - Université de Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier, UM - Université de Montpellier

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper aims at analyzing the role of an environmental tax or an environmental subsidy as instruments for preserving phosphate reserves, for improving water quality by reducing eutrophication, and for increasing social welfare. Toward these goals, we use a duopoly model "à la Stack- elberg", assume the presence of a benevolent government that takes into account the bene.cial e¤ect of recycling in the social welfare function and refunds the revenue of the tax to the society. First, we .nd that taxing extracted phosphorus or subsidizing recycled phosphorus contributes to the postponement of the depletion of the resource and to the reduction of eutrophication. Second, we .nd that taxing extracted phosphorus reduces consumers.surplus, whereas subsidizing recycled phosphorus increases it. Third, we show that the subsidy set by the regulator is higher than the marginal bene.t of recycling, whereas the level of the tax with respect to the marginal social damage of pollution is ambiguous. Fourth, we state that the tax and the subsidy increase social welfare. Fifth, by way of com- parison, we .nd that if the regulator aims at saving phosphorus, reducing eutrophication and improving social welfare simultaneously, subsidizing recycled phosphorus is the best policy, but if he aims only at saving phos- phorus and reducing eutrophication, taxing extracted phosphorus is more optimal than subsidizing recycled phosphorus.

Keywords: Subsidy; Phosphorus; Recycling; Environmental tax; Eutrophication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02801273v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in 9. Journées de recherches en sciences sociales INRA SFER CIRAD, Dec 2015, Nancy, France. 33 p., 2016

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02801273v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02801273

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().