Direct and indirect punishment of norm violations in daily life

Catherine Molho, Joshua Tybur, Paul A.M. van Lange and Daniel Balliet
Additional contact information
Catherine Molho: IAST - Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse
Joshua Tybur: VU - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam]
Paul A.M. van Lange: VU - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam]
Daniel Balliet: VU - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Across societies, humans punish norm violations. To date, research on the antecedents and consequences of punishment has largely relied upon agent-based modeling and laboratory experiments. Here, we report a longitudinal study documenting punishment responses to norm violations in daily life (k = 1507; N = 257) and test pre-registered hypotheses about the antecedents of direct punishment (i.e., confrontation) and indirect punishment (i.e., gossip and social exclusion). We find that people use confrontation versus gossip in a context-sensitive manner. Confrontation is more likely when punishers have been personally victimized, have more power, and value offenders more. Gossip is more likely when norm violations are severe and when punishers have less power, value offenders less, and experience disgust. Findings reveal a complex punishment psychology that weighs the benefits of adjusting others' behavior against the risks of retaliation.

Date: 2020-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Published in Nature Communications, 2020, 11 (3432), pp.1-9

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02909831

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().