Enhancing organisational commitment through task significance: the moderating role of openness to experience
Anabel Fernández-Mesa,
Oscar Llopis,
Ana García-Granero and
Julia Olmos-Peñuela
Additional contact information
Anabel Fernández-Mesa: UV - Universitat de València = University of Valencia
Oscar Llopis: UV - Universitat de València = University of Valencia, ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business
Ana García-Granero: UV - Universitat de València = University of Valencia
Julia Olmos-Peñuela: UV - Universitat de València = University of Valencia
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Researchers have extensively explored the factors influencing employees' organisational commitment. However, few studies make an explicit distinction between different commitment types when exploring its determinants, and the scholarly attention to individual differences is also limited. In this paper, we confirm that developing managerial interventions to enhance task significance can be useful to promote organisational commitment, but this relationship is contingent on the commitment type and the employees' openness to experience. We focus on two forms of organisational commitment: affective and continuance commitment. Our study shows that task significance is a better predictor of affective commitment than continuance commitment.We also find that increasing task significance is particularly good to promote more continuance commitment among employees with low levels of openness to experience. Based on data gathered from a sample of 403 employees working in Spanish firms, we find support for these ideas and develop practical implications.
Keywords: Continuance commitment; Affective commitment; Task significance; Openness to experience (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-08
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://rennes-sb.hal.science/hal-03004571v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Published in European Management Journal, 2020, 38 (4), pp.602-612. ⟨10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.010⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://rennes-sb.hal.science/hal-03004571v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03004571
DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.010
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().