How to win a bid for major sporting events? A stakeholder analysis of the 2018 Olympic Winter Games French bid

Christopher Hautbois (), Milena M. Parent and Benoît Séguin
Additional contact information
Christopher Hautbois: CIAMS - Complexité, Innovation, Activités Motrices et Sportives - UP11 - Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 - UO - Université d'Orléans
Milena M. Parent: uOttawa - Université d'Ottawa [Ontario]
Benoît Séguin: uOttawa - Université d'Ottawa [Ontario]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: While understanding the planning and hosting of major sporting events is a popular research area, less is known about the bid process despite the potential economic and political spinoffs. Some studies offer criteria for successful bids and even consider the stakeholder network as a key factor. Considering the importance of the stakeholder network, we delve deeper into this area. Using the power, legitimacy and urgency framework by . Mitchell et al. (1997), we examine the 2018 Olympic Winter Games' French national bid competition (four candidacies) to analyse the stakeholder relationships, identify their salience and then determine stakeholder-based bid key success factors. Archival material and 28 interviews were analysed. We notably found that to increase the probability of winning, no actor alone should have a definitive status, the sport stakeholder group should have at least the expectant status, and no strategic stakeholder should have the latent status. We also find that a three-level analysis of the stakeholder network allows for a greater understanding of the bid governance and process dynamics at play, which help to elucidate a successful bid. We contribute to the literature by (a) showing how stakeholder salience analysis can assist in understanding the bid network governance structure; (b) demonstrating that stakeholder salience depends on the level which is analysed (local, between bids, and with the event owner), the stage (deciding to bid, national bid competition, national bid win/international competition), and the case/context; and (c) determining stakeholder-based key bid success factors such as who should and should not be more salient in the bid process. © 2012 Sport Management Association of Australia and New Zealand.

Keywords: decision-making; image; management; identification; stakeholder; bid; olympic games; major sporting events; perspective; ties (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03550776v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Published in Sport Management Review, 2012, 15 (3), pp.263-275. ⟨10.1016/j.smr.2012.01.002⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03550776v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03550776

DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2012.01.002

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().