The CAP and the environment: Who wins?

PAC et environnement: les exploitations les plus vertueuses sont-elles récompensées ?

Pauline Avril, Aude Ridier and Élisabeth Samson
Additional contact information
Pauline Avril: LEO - Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orleans [2021-2022] - UO - Université d'Orléans - UT - Université de Tours
Élisabeth Samson: SMART-LERECO - Structures et Marché Agricoles, Ressources et Territoires - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - INSTITUT AGRO Agrocampus Ouest - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This article examines whether the CAP's first-pillar subsidies have been allocated to farms, between 2002 and 2017, following environmental and income criteria. The individual levels of greenhouse gas emissions of farms are calculated using the AGRIBALYSE reference system and the French FADN database for two farm types: dairy cattle and cereals and oilseeds. We show, using a fixed effect panel model, that the 2014 reform allowed for greater allocation of support to farms according to their impact on emissions and income than the 2003 reform.

Keywords: Fixed effect panel model; AGRIBALYSE; Redistribution; CAP; Panel à effets fixes; PAC (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-09-30
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Économie rurale, 2021, 21 (377), pp.893-909. ⟨10.4000/economierurale.9185⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03572388

DOI: 10.4000/economierurale.9185

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().