Does Affective Forecasting Error Induce Changes in Preferences? Lessons from Danish Soldiers Anticipating Combat in Afghanistan

Olivier Chanel, Stéphanie Vincent Lyk-Jensen and Jean-Christophe Vergnaud
Additional contact information
Stéphanie Vincent Lyk-Jensen: Danish Centre for Social Science Research

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper investigates how affective forecasting errors (A.F.E.s), the difference between anticipated emotion and the emotion actually experienced, may induce changes in preferences on time, risk and occupation after combat. Building on psychological theories incorporating the role of emotion in decision-making, we designed a before-and-after-mission survey for Danish soldiers deployed to Afghanistan in 2011. Our hypothesis of an effect from A.F.E.s is tested by controlling for other mechanisms that may also change preferences: immediate emotion, trauma effect – proxied by post-traumatic stress disorder (P.T.S.D.) – and changes in wealth and risk perception. At the aggregate level, results show stable preferences before and after mission. We find positive A.F.E.s for all three emotions studied (fear, anxiety and excitement), with anticipated emotions stronger than those actually experienced. We provide evidence that positive A.F.E.s regarding fear significantly increase risk tolerance and impatience, while positive A.F.E.s regarding excitement strengthen the will to stay in the military. Trauma has no impact on these preferences.

Keywords: Risk preferences; time preferences; affective forecasting errors; P.T.S.D.; Afghanistan; combat (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-07
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-03620348
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Defence and Peace Economics, 2023, 34 (5), pp.660-683. ⟨10.1080/10242694.2022.2037829⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://amu.hal.science/hal-03620348/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Does Affective Forecasting Error Induce Changes in Preferences? Lessons from Danish Soldiers Anticipating Combat in Afghanistan (2023)
Working Paper: Does Affective Forecasting Error Induce Changes in Preferences? Lessons from Danish Soldiers Anticipating Combat in Afghanistan (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03620348

DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2022.2037829

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().