EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Cut or keep: What should a forest owner do after a windthrow?

Claudio Petucco, Pablo Andrés-Domenech and Lilian Duband
Additional contact information
Claudio Petucco: ERIN - Environmental Research and Innovation (ERIN - Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology) - LIST - Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
Lilian Duband: ONF - Office national des forêts

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: After a windstorm hits a forest stand the forest owner has two possibilities: clear cut and start a new rotation or let the standing trees grow until maturity. We compute the Land Expectation Value (LEV) under the risk of windthrow and introduce an endogenous rule to account for this decision. We compare the result with the default alternative of systematic clear felling and replanting (commonly assumed in existing literature). We have calibrated our model to represent maritime pine plantations in south-western France. Results show that by following this rule, payoffs may increase by up to 90% when the economic risk (i.e. probability of having a windstorm) is high. About 75% of the time it is profitable to keep the standing trees until maturity. Although payoffs are sensitive to economic risk, the optimal rotation age does not change much with significant increases in the risk probability.

Keywords: Faustmann; Land expectation value; Optimal rotation age; Risk; Windthrow; Forestry; Pine; Plantation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-04-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 461, pp.117866. ⟨10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117866⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03654443

DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117866

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03654443