Production and Education According to James Mill: the Precious Middle Point

Victor Bianchini ()
Additional contact information
Victor Bianchini: PHARE - Philosophie, Histoire et Analyse des Représentations Économiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Although James Mill considered production and education to be two objectives of global welfare, he claimed that the former was not always consistent with the latter. On the one hand, production is necessary to provide humankind with the means of subsistence; on the other hand, if individuals allocate all their time to labor to the detriment of their own education, "neither intellect, virtue nor happiness can flourish upon the earth" (Mill [1819] 1825, p. 30). Mill argued that this problem might be solved by finding what he called "the precious middle point." This point deserves special consideration: it acknowledges that there is a way in which education and production might be distributed in society in order to promote the greatest global welfare. The aim of this paper is to explain the relation between production and education through the working of the precious middle point.

Date: 2016-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2016, 38 (2), pp.153-173. ⟨10.1017/S1053837216000067⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03839453

DOI: 10.1017/S1053837216000067

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().