Sensitive topics of scientific research

Temas sensibles de la investigación científica

Jean-Jacques Pluchart
Additional contact information
Jean-Jacques Pluchart: UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, PRISM Sorbonne - Pôle de recherche interdisciplinaire en sciences du management - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The aim of this research is to analyse the different types of sensitive topics that can be observed in scientific approaches, to identify their causes, to explore their effects and to propose methods for their treatment. The most common typology distinguishes between subjects dealing with painful personal experiences, deviant behaviour, personalities, or entities with power, and sacred or taboo themes. A transposition of this grid to research approaches leads to a distinction between errors, frauds, manipulations, and scientific deconstructions. This exploratory research uses the case study method. It reveals that sensitive scientific topics are increasingly detected by Artificial Intelligence applications and made public by social networks. They have increasingly wide-ranging and lasting impacts on the careers and reputations of the researchers involved. These effects are more detrimental when the researchers are respected by the academic community. Among the types of issues observed, two involve ethical violations (fraud and manipulation) but two do not a priori violate scientific ethics (errors and deconstructions). The ethical criterion is therefore apparently not sufficient to characterise a sensitive subject, unlike the criterion of its negative effects on the reputations and/or behaviour of researchers, which turns out to be universal. Subjects are perceived as more sensitive if they raise radical, repressed questions and express doubts about the validity of dominant theories or the social conformity of behaviour. The most sensitive subjects' question – or deconstruct – concepts, heuristics, theories, or paradigms validated by the scientific community and anchored in a culture. This research contributes to the current reflection on scientific relativism that is spreading in all disciplines. It shows that « desensitisation » of a subject requires open debate between the parties concerned critical analyses of the subjects' perceptions and the search for greater « theoretical sensitivity ».

Keywords: sujet; sensibilité; normalité; verité; responsabilité (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 2022, 1 (313), pp.35-42

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04012339

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().