Social Media as a Form of Virtual Whistleblowing: Empirical Evidence for Elements of the Diamond Model
Hengky Latan,
Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour () and
Ana Beatriz Sousa Jabbour ()
Additional contact information
Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour: MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier, University of Stirling
Ana Beatriz Sousa Jabbour: Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
This article originally advances the field of organizational whistleblowing by empirically investigating the suitability of the four elements of the fraud diamond as a means to understand the intention to disclose wrongdoing through virtual channels. This article also makes a contribution on the theme of whistleblowing as it relates to customers, an under-studied, however, relevant stakeholder in this field. The main findings of the article are as follows: (a) the four elements of the fraud diamond as they relate to whistleblowing-a combination of pressure, financial incentive, opportunity and rationalization, and capability-can explain the intentions behind customer reports of wrongdoing; (b) online social media channels are customers' preferred means of whistleblowing; (c) the elements of opportunity and capability are strongly correlated with the use of social media as a method of disclosing wrongdoing; and (d) virtual channels can be useful for whistleblowers in order to avoid potential retaliation. Unique managerial and academic implications of these research findings are also discussed, extending the layers of knowledge on whistleblowing in organizations.
Keywords: Business ethics; Capability; Financial incentive; Online whistleblowing; Opportunity; Pressure; Rationalization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Journal of Business Ethics, 2021, 174 (3), pp.529--548. ⟨10.1007/s10551-020-04598-y⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04275091
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04598-y
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().