EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Navigating multiple accountabilities through managers’ boundary work in professional service firms

Ricardo Azambuja, Lisa Baudot and Bertrand Malsch
Additional contact information
Ricardo Azambuja: ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business
Lisa Baudot: UCF - University of Central Florida [Orlando]
Bertrand Malsch: Queen Margaret University College

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose This study explores the professional work of managers in professional service firms (PSFs) by focusing on the relational position of managers as they interface between diverse groups of actors and navigate a multiplicity of accountabilities. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on an ethnographic study of managers in a Brazilian PSF, this study demonstrates through observations, interviews and shadowing how PSF managers address multiple accountabilities in the conduct of professional work. Findings To navigate multiple accountabilities, PSF managers perform several forms of boundary work, which the authors conceptualize as "revamping" and "remolding" operations and "translating" and "transforming" understandings. The form of boundary work performed depends on the configuration of two elements of accountability demands: knowledge orientation and extent of exposure. Although analytically distinct, these elements intertwine, suggesting the need for a dynamic perspective on accountability. The analysis shows that professional work extends beyond fixed or passive views of hierarchical and intrinsic accountability to emphasize that managers exude accountability of an adaptive nature. Research limitations/implications This study illustrates and theorizes the role of boundary work in PSFs, develops its link to accountability, and identifies its scholarly and practical affordances and limitations for understanding managers' professional work when navigating multiple accountabilities. Originality/value The findings reveal perspectives and behaviors of managers embedded in PSFs, illustrating their unstructured and agentic experiences of accountability and boundary work in practice. The insights can be extended to other contexts where managers face multiple accountabilities in conducting professional work.

Date: 2023-08-22
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2023, 36 (7/8), pp.1734-1762. ⟨10.1108/AAAJ-08-2021-5407⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04278068

DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-08-2021-5407

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04278068