Enhancing capacities for sustainability transition policy design: Lessons from French pesticide reduction plans

Viviane Trèves (), Mourad Hannachi () and Jean-Marc Meynard ()
Additional contact information
Viviane Trèves: SADAPT - Sciences pour l'Action et le Développement : Activités, Produits, Territoires - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Mourad Hannachi: SADAPT - Sciences pour l'Action et le Développement : Activités, Produits, Territoires - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Jean-Marc Meynard: SADAPT - Sciences pour l'Action et le Développement : Activités, Produits, Territoires - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: CONTEXT Reducing pesticide use has become an important policy objective in several countries, yet many have failed to reach their goals. Policies need to be more systemic to address lock-ins hindering pesticide reduction. To do so, policymakers must improve policymaking processes, while ensuring active stakeholder participation. This requires specific policy capacities, which have not yet been characterized. OBJECTIVE This article aims to identify policy capacities needed to improve the collective elaboration of pesticide reduction policies and integrate a systemic approach. METHODS We studied the collective elaboration of the French pesticide reduction plans. We built a narration of the policy process organized by policymakers, based on semi-structured interviews and an analysis of grey literature. We then reflected on which policy capacities policymakers needed to better manage the policy design process, using the "management situation" concept. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Our results show that to better design pesticide reduction policies, policymakers lacked four types of interdependent "policy capacities": capacities to support collective sensemaking about lock-ins, to co-design interdependent and multi-level instruments, to co-design suitable implementation structures and to ensure learning. These results highlight an issue of dynamic capabilities in public organizations. SIGNIFICANCE Our results provide concrete proposals to improve design processes for pesticide reduction policies aiming at systemic transformations: there is a need to develop new methods, tools, analytical resources and training programs for policymakers, to support the development of the policy capacities identified. These results also suggest avenues for future action-research between public management, systemic agronomy, sustainability and design sciences.

Keywords: Pesticide reduction; Lock-in; Policymaking process; Policy capacity; Management science; Sociotechnical transition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04803908v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Agricultural Systems, 2025, 223, pp.104175. ⟨10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104175⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04803908v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04803908

DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104175

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().