Noise and opinion dynamics: How ambiguity promotes pro-majority consensus in the presence of confirmation bias

Peter Steiglechner, Marijn Keijzer, Paul E. Smaldino, Deyshawn Moser and Agostino Merico
Additional contact information
Peter Steiglechner: Unknown
Marijn Keijzer: IAST - Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse
Paul E. Smaldino: Unknown
Deyshawn Moser: Unknown
Agostino Merico: Unknown

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Opinion patterns are affected by cognitive biases and noise. While mathematical models have focused extensively on biases, we still know surprisingly little about how different types of noise shape opinion patterns. Here, we use an agent-based opinion dynamics model to investigate the interplay between confirmation bias—represented as bounded confidence—and different types of noise, including a new type: ambiguity noise. While the types of noise considered in the past acted on the agents either before, after, or independent of social interaction, ambiguity noise acts on communicated messages, assuming that the expression of opinions is inherently noisy. We find that noise can induce agreement when the confirmation bias is moderate, but different types of noise lead to quite different conditions for this effect to occur. An application of our model to the climate change debate shows that at just the right mix of confirmation bias and ambiguity noise, opinions tend to converge to a high level of climate change concern. This result is not observed in the absence of noise or with the other types of noise. Our findings highlight the importance of considering and distinguishing between the various types of noise affecting opinion formation and the special role played by ambiguity.

Keywords: Agent-Based Model; Opinion Formation; Noise; Bounded Confidence; Climate Change; Computational Social Science (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-04-24
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Royal Society Open Science, 2024, vol. 11 (n° 4), ⟨10.1098/rsos.231071⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04823354

DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231071

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().