 Mentoring: Could There Also Be Caveats in It?Nikos Bozionelos (),
Saquifa Seraj and
Georgios Bozionelos
Post-Print from HAL Abstract: Mentoring has long been viewed as an effective tool for human resource development. This paper challenges the mainstream view that mentoring is unequivocally beneficial to organizations and by extent to the wider social system. The argument is built on four caveats that emerge from the available literature: (1) evidence on the relationship of mentoring receipt with protégé job performance (as opposed to career success) is elusive; (2) the mechanism via which mentoring enhances protégé career success appears to rely mostly on power and political processes; (3) the type of learning imparted by mentoring seems mostly related to the understanding and implementation of political tactics for personal gain; and (4) the possibility that mentoring may, at times, impair protégés' ethos and lower their ethical standards. The conclusion is that caution – instead of unconditional enthusiasm – must be exercised with mentoring. The article closes with guidelines for practice and suggestions for future research, which can serve as starting points in the adoption of a more balanced view of mentoring. Keywords: mentoring; dark side; career success; protégé; mentor; job performance; ethical standards; organizational politics (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in European Management Review, inPress, 9 p. ⟨10.1111/emre.70003⟩ There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05001610 DOI: 10.1111/emre.70003 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Post-Print from HAL |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.