Does the geographical indications protection policy encourage more sustainable agriculture in the territories? Moving from claims to empirical evidence

Julie Regolo (), Cédric Gendre and Thomas Poméon ()
Additional contact information
Julie Regolo: US ODR - Observatoire des Programmes Communautaires de Développement Rural - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Cédric Gendre: US ODR - Observatoire des Programmes Communautaires de Développement Rural - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Thomas Poméon: US ODR - Observatoire des Programmes Communautaires de Développement Rural - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This article aims to assess the impact of the Geographical Indications (GIs) protection policy on the sustainable development of agriculture in mainland France. More specifically, it analyses the impact over the last decade of the increase in the territorial magnitude of agri-food GIs on agricultural economic performance, agricultural employment and agricultural pressures on the environment (biodiversity and water quality). The magnitude of GIs is assessed using two distinct indicators: the proportion of farmers involved in GIs and the diversity of GI products within each territory. We use data at a fine territorial scale (cantonal level – NUTS4) and a meso-economic approach. We estimate a difference in differences econometric model to continuous variables, and we control for the effect of the presence of operators involved in organic farming in the territory, and of payments under the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy, which may impact sustainable development indicators. The results show that, all other factors being equal, cantons where there has been an increase in the presence of GIs over the last decade have seen greater improvements in their economic, social and environmental performance than cantons where there has been no increase. They also indicate the distinct and complementary effects of GI diversity and intensity in the territory, in terms of contribution to sustainable development.

Keywords: Territory France; Geographical indications; Sustainable development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-env, nep-eur and nep-mac
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05234723v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Ecological Economics, 2025, 238, pp.108717. ⟨10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108717⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05234723v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05234723

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108717

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().