EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How robust is the equal split? Transferable utility and three-person bargaining in the laboratory

Noemí Navarro () and Róbert F. Veszteg
Additional contact information
Noemí Navarro: CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Róbert F. Veszteg: Waseda University [Tokyo, Japan]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper investigates the robustness of equal-split outcomes in unstructured bargaining environments, expanding on classic two-person settings to include payoff transfers and multi-party bargaining. Drawing from experimental data, we find that equal splits persist as a focal solution in two-person bargaining with payoff transfers, even when some potential efficiency gains are left unexploited, likely due to limitations in participants' cognitive and strategic sophistication. In three-person settings (without payoff transfers), while agreements align closely with equality, they tend to do so only as long as efficiency and stability criteria are met. Our results suggest that bargaining parties prioritize equality when efficient solutions are complicated to find, but prioritize efficiency when efficient solutions are easily accessible. Also, in multilateral bargaining, coalitional stability becomes a primary concern, whereas it remains a softer constraint in simpler, bilateral negotiations.

Keywords: Economics; Multilateral bargaining; Experiments; Nash bargaining solution; Equal-split solution; Individual rationality; Microeconomics; Robustness (evolution); Sophistication; Stochastic game; Negotiation; Bilateral bargaining (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-gth and nep-upt
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05240606v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Economic Inequality, 2025, ⟨10.1007/s10888-025-09694-5⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05240606v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05240606

DOI: 10.1007/s10888-025-09694-5

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-27
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05240606