When Did Growth Begin? New Estimates of Productivity Growth in England from 1250 to 1870
Paul Bouscasse,
Emi Nakamura and
Jón Steinsson
Additional contact information
Paul Bouscasse: ECON - Département d'économie (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Emi Nakamura: UC Berkeley - University of California [Berkeley] - UC - University of California
Jón Steinsson: UC Berkeley - University of California [Berkeley] - UC - University of California
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Abstract We estimate productivity growth in England from 1250 to 1870. Real wages over this period were heavily influenced by plague-induced swings in the population. Our estimates account for these Malthusian dynamics. We find that productivity growth was zero before 1600. Productivity growth began in 1600—almost a century before the Glorious Revolution. Thus, the onset of productivity growth preceded the bourgeois institutional reforms of seventeenth-century England. We estimate productivity growth of 2% per decade between 1600 and 1800, increasing to 5% per decade between 1810 and 1860. Much of the increase in output growth during the Industrial Revolution is explained by structural change—the falling importance of land in production—rather than faster productivity growth. Stagnant real wages in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries—Engels' Pause—is explained by rapid population growth putting downward pressure on real wages. Yet feedback from population growth to real wages is sufficiently weak to permit sustained deviations from the "iron law of wages" prior to the Industrial Revolution.
Date: 2025-05-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2025, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140 (2), pp.835-888. ⟨10.1093/qje/qjae046⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05447164
DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjae046
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().