EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Toward a more complete understanding of institutional logic configuration in an M&A project

Anne-Sophie Thelisson ()
Additional contact information
Anne-Sophie Thelisson: UR CONFLUENCE : Sciences et Humanités (EA 1598) - UCLy - UCLy (Lyon Catholic University), ESDES - ESDES, Lyon Business School - UCLy - UCLy - UCLy (Lyon Catholic University)

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The frequency and scale of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have significantly increased in the last two decades, in spite of continuous reports on their high failure rates. M&A scholars call for insights to be sought on the merger process to help understand the complexity of these operations and decrease their failure rate. M&A scholars advocate paying attention to institutional logics' configuration shaping a firm's decisions to grasp merger process complexity. Institutional studies show how specific logics have a powerful influence on the strategic decisions and priorities of organizations. Yet, few studies have empirically combined multiple levels by framing logics' configuration fostering specific strategic decisions. This study addresses this issue. Using a longitudinal case study, we analyze how institutional logics' configuration at organizational and inter-organizational levels supports firms' strategic decisions to merge and to end the deal. We demonstrate that despite the alignment of logics at the organizational level, the multiplicity of logics at the inter-organizational level led to deal failure.

Keywords: merger; institutional logics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Strategic Change, 2024, 33 (6), pp.463-477. ⟨10.1002/jsc.2597⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05486538

DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2597

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2026-02-03
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05486538