Thinking Skills Don't Protect Service Workers from Replacement by Artificial Intelligence
Darina Vorobeva (),
Yasmina El Fassi,
Diego Costa Pinto,
Diego Hildebrand,
Marcia M. Herter and
Anna S. Mattila
Additional contact information
Darina Vorobeva: EM - EMLyon Business School
Yasmina El Fassi: Universidade Nova de Lisboa (Portugal, Lisbon) - NOVA
Diego Costa Pinto: Universidade Nova de Lisboa (Portugal, Lisbon) - NOVA
Diego Hildebrand: Baruch College [CUNY] - CUNY - City University of New York [New York]
Marcia M. Herter: Universidade Europeia (Portugal, Lisbon) - UEL
Anna S. Mattila: Penn State - Pennsylvania State University [State College, PA] - Penn State System
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Despite the documented benefits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to the service industry, the service employees' fear of being replaced by AI continues to be a major concern as we transition to the Feeling Economy. This paper builds upon the Feeling Economy framework and the social comparison theory to examine how different service-related tasks (thinking vs feeling) distinctively impact the service employees' feelings and behavior. Five studies reveal that the presence of AI increases negative outcomes for employees engaging in thinking (vs. feeling) tasks due to its adverse effects on their perceived ability (i.e., relative performance). Findings further indicate that these detrimental effects only happen when service employees compare their abilities with those of AI. This research provides important theoretical and managerial implications, helping to mitigate AI's negative outcomes on employees' fear of replacement and reduced job performance.
Keywords: feeling economy; fear; job performance; services (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-11-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Journal of Service Research, 2022, 25 (4), pp.601 - 613. ⟨10.1177/10946705221104312⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05488128
DOI: 10.1177/10946705221104312
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().