EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Diversity, interactions, and team creativity: An experimental perspective

Anne-Gaëlle Maltese (), Sara Gil-Gallen and Patrick Llerena
Additional contact information
Anne-Gaëlle Maltese: CLERSÉ - Centre Lillois d’Études et de Recherches Sociologiques et Économiques - UMR 8019 - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Sara Gil-Gallen: Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies (ISTC), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 00196, Rome, Italy
Patrick Llerena: BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Although team creativity has long attracted scholarly interest, few studies have addressed the joint impact of diversity and interpersonal interactions on team creative performance. The present study contributes to the literature by examining the role of diversity in team performance and unpacking the complex effects of networks by distinguishing between in-situ and pre-existing interactions. Additionally, it investigates the relationship between individual and team performance when both are measured experimentally. To this end, we implemented a three-stage experimental protocol within a novel experimental setting including face-to-face interactions among subjects under a controlled environment. The findings show that the effects of diversity, individual performance, network structure, and creativity training on overall team creativity vary depending on the evaluative criterion considered (originality vs. feasibility). Diversity appears to have an overall positive effect on creative performance with the exception of language diversity in the generation of original ideas. Social closeness and frequent interactions help teams converge toward original ideas (and toward feasible ones in the case of frequent interactions), whereas in-situ ties tend to hinder their implementability.

Keywords: Collective experiment; Networks; Diversity; Team creativity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2026, 122, pp.102562. ⟨10.1016/j.socec.2026.102562⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05608405

DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2026.102562

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2026-05-12
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05608405