Amplified (in)visibility: How gender quotas reshape invisible labor and identity in STEM academia

Linh-Chi Vo (), Diana Santistevan () and Anne-Sophie Thelisson ()
Additional contact information
Linh-Chi Vo: Kedge BS - Kedge Business School
Diana Santistevan: Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie = EM Normandie Business School
Anne-Sophie Thelisson: UR CONFLUENCE : Sciences et Humanités (EA 1598) - UCLy - UCLy (Lyon Catholic University), ESDES - ESDES, Lyon Business School - UCLy - UCLy - UCLy (Lyon Catholic University)

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: (In)visibility in the workplace—encompassing invisibility, visibility, and hypervisibility—remains a persistent challenge for women working in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. While previous research has highlighted women's coping strategies in male-dominated contexts, it has often overlooked how external institutional pressures—such as parity laws—intensify the experience of (in)visibility in novel ways. This qualitative study of women faculty working in STEM fields in French public universities, which have state-mandated gender quotas, addresses this gap, examining how these women navigate the cumulative effects of (in)visibility. Our study makes three contributions to the (in)visibility literature: (1) we theorize and empirically show that these quotas produce amplified (in)visibility—a condition that simultaneously increases, distorts, and undermines visibility—generating disproportionate invisible labor and identity strain; (2) the amplified (in)visibility dynamic creates invisible work burdens for women, including cultural taxation and quota-driven intellectual labor; and (3) amplified (in)visibility, as a structural, externally imposed form of (in)visibility not stemming from traditional marginalization but from institutional interventions, leads women to engage in sustained identity work as they seek to reconcile their professional roles with evolving self-understandings, producing outcomes ranging from resilience to identity impasse.

Keywords: Gender quota; Identity work; Invisible labor; Women; STEM; Amplified (in)visibility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2026, 168, pp.104254. ⟨10.1016/j.jvb.2026.104254⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05659192

DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2026.104254

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().